The points made above by Di and Tim reflect perfectly how I feel about this. Come on JY, it's not too late - reverse this counterproductive policy change before more damage is done! There have been over 50 posts on this topic over the last two days which shows the depth of feeling. JY constantly state how they prioritise customer care - prove that you mean this and please take swift action.
Bob
Nicely put, short and to the point. Do it!
I agree with just about everything that has been written (except the purchase of conspicuous headphones)
> I hope those who took this decision are taking note of all the comments made, I don't suppose they care anyway as long as the money keeps coming in, but at least they know how their customers feel about it.
However, I suspect that Avocet is right.
I came upon these threads late and have just read them with great interest (and not a little cynicism). Since we now have a classic "tour de table" among regular Forum contributors, I thought I had better add my voice in support.
This is clearly a reduction in customer service for no obviously convincing reason. I am relaxed about age ranges and M/F ratios but definitely not about maximum group sizes for all the reasons already stated, and I too would not wish to join a group with more than 30 participants - pity really, as I quite fancy the NZ one - and I have already ruled out trips to the USA by several tour operators for the same reason. I also find it convenient to be able to monitor the number of places sold/remaining for a given tour, when it gets the "green light" and when it is sold out (all bar the last (no chance of that!) freely provided for a small-group TS tour next month by a very helpful operative).
One question: if, as someone has suggested, JY would like to retain the option to increase a tour group's size if a particular tour is selling well, would the labels "maximum group size", "places remaining" and "sold out" have a definite meaning?
If (senior) management at whatever level really is monitoring this feedback (and, if they have already made up their collective mind, why should they bother?) then this may be a "toe in the water" job: put an announcement on the Forum and see what comes back. Well, now they know.
If this is usual management procedure (senior management makes "policy" decision - middle management/HR/customer-facing staff told to go away and implement - customer dissatisfaction - much moaning which gradually dies away - new unacceptable situation becomes the status quo: we have all been there?) then what would make them change their mind? Presumably only a reduction in bookings when customers vote with their feet? I imagine that they have taken a long, hard look at the Forum and seen the almost fanatically loyal following, and believe that this will not diminish. It will be interesting to see.
Presumably this "policy" decision has been taken on commercial grounds (why else?) in view of the perceived threat to the business posed by the other high-quality exclusively solo travel company (small but steadily growing) and the ever-increasing number of large (and good) companies which are now targeting the solo travel market (especially among retired persons with both time and money), which is becoming an important target demographic.
But, O Management, these companies regularly disclose some combination of such parameters as 'group size'/whether a group is 'small' or not, 'number of places remaining' and 'sold out': they do not appear to suffer thereby, and show no signs of ending the practice, so why should JY and TS consider themselves to be disadvantaged?
Management may regard the views of what they may see as a small sample of their customer base, while the remainder (non Forum users) couldn't care less - but this may prove to be a dangerous assumption, as it could be any of their customers who provide the valuable free advertising: I have been on several holidays with other companies which also included people who had travelled with JY, seldom posted on this Forum, and who were always ready to tell me of their experiences, as a result of which I have a short list of JY holidays which have come with definite and reliable recommendations: real dissatisfaction among JY clients, however loyal, will inevitably colour the impression they give of JY as a travel company in future.
Finally, I wonder what "management" really think of this Forum? I assume it was a local initiative of JY staff as it does not cover TS? At least we have a forum, unlike most other travel companies - and we had the announcement - so thanks to Julia for that! Presumably TS customers will only find out when they go to make a booking . . .
Jim