I agree with Roger that the reason meals are being reduced, far from reacting to customer feedback as JY would suggest, is more to do with keeping the headline price of the holiday down. While I’m quite happy to stroll around in the evening with others, providing that there is a good choice of restaurants in the immediate vicinity of the hotel, I also realise that JY will find it hard to please all of the people all of the time. Mandy’s (AELB) earlier post on this subject highlighted beautifully the pros and cons of this contentious issue.
For myself, I’m more concerned about the number of excursions that now appear as ‘optional’, rather than ‘included’, on many tours. Even the short eight day tours to Italy offer at least 3 optional excursions and when you consider the more expensive long haul tours that number increases to a maximum of 11 (Australian Highlights & America’s Western Wonders). The New Zealand tour offers 10 optional excursions, as does Canada East to West.
I realise that these examples are tours of a longer duration - up to 23 days in the case of the Australian tour - but to fund all of the available options, should people wish to do so, does add a large chunk of cash to the overall cost of the holiday.
One final thought: Vickie, in an earlier reply on this thread you seem to put great store by the fact that flights, hotels and Tour Managers are included in the holiday price. I’m bound to say that it wouldn’t be much of a holiday without them! Or will flights perhaps be the next thing that customers will have to fund separately?
Cheers
Mike